Congress is reviving one of the most significant antitrust bills Apple has faced in years, reopening a fight over the App Store and platform control that the company helped spend millions to defeat during previous congressional sessions.
Sens. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., and Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, reintroduced the American Innovation and Choice Online Act (AICOA) on June 10. It revives a bipartisan effort to limit how dominant technology companies favor their own products and services.
The bill targets the largest online platforms and seeks to restrict conduct that supporters say gives those companies an unfair advantage. Apple and other technology giants spent years fighting earlier versions of the legislation because of its potential impact on their businesses.
The proposal would prevent dominant technology companies from favoring their own products and services. Lawmakers describe those practices as self-preferencing and argue they can disadvantage competitors.
Critics argue Apple uses its position as the operator of iOS and the App Store to benefit its own services over competing products. The legislation could directly affect the App Store and Apple’s control over the iPhone ecosystem.
Apple has consistently argued that its policies help protect user privacy, security, and the integrity of its platforms. In a statement provided to AppleInsider, Apple said it “strongly disagree[s] with the Senate’s consideration of European-style regulation” and argued the legislation would undermine privacy, security, and child safety protections while making it harder to do business in the United States.
The company also said importing Europe’s “failed policies” would not increase competition. The reintroduction marks the latest chapter in a legislative battle that has stretched across multiple sessions of Congress.
Earlier versions of AICOA advanced through the Senate Judiciary Committee but never reached a final vote despite bipartisan support. The bill came closer to becoming law than many technology reform proposals.
The debate around AICOA has changed since Congress first considered the legislation. Apple has already made significant App Store changes in Europe to comply with the Digital Markets Act.
The European law imposed new requirements on how large technology platforms compete and operate. The DMA and AICOA take different approaches to regulation.
Both aim to limit how dominant technology companies use control of their platforms to benefit their own products and services. For Apple, the DMA offers a real-world example of the kinds of changes lawmakers have sought through AICOA.
The company argues AICOA would mirror key elements of Europe’s Digital Markets Act, which required the company to make significant App Store changes in the European Union. According to Apple, the DMA has weakened privacy protections, increased security risks, and created a more difficult environment for product launches and platform development.
Why Apple fought the bill
Apple was among several technology companies that opposed the legislation during its previous runs through Congress. It argued that some provisions could make it harder to maintain privacy and security protections on its platforms.
Industry groups representing large technology companies also warned that the legislation could have unintended consequences for integrated products and services.
Supporters argue dominant platforms have too much control over businesses that depend on them. They say existing antitrust laws haven’t done enough to address those concerns.
Major technology companies spent heavily to stop AICOA and related antitrust legislation. Previous reporting found that Apple, Amazon, Google, and Meta collectively spent more than $100 million on lobbying and advocacy efforts tied to the proposals.
Trade groups also joined the fight, and industry-backed advertising campaigns helped amplify the opposition. The legislation ultimately stalled despite advancing through committee and attracting support from both parties.
Why the legislation matters now
The bill’s return doesn’t guarantee it will become law. Previous versions generated substantial attention and bipartisan support but ultimately stalled before reaching the finish line.
For Apple, the debate extends beyond another round of regulatory scrutiny. The legislation could affect how the App Store operates and how Apple Services compete on the company’s platforms.
Whether the latest version gains enough support to advance remains unclear. Its return shows that Congress is still trying to limit how dominant technology platforms use control of their ecosystems to benefit their own products and services.
