Harpreet flagged something odd in a Google AI Overview and shared it on X, pointing out that the AIO cited four self-serving listicles within its answer, yet the one brand ranking itself #1 in those listicles wasn’t actually mentioned in the AI-generated answer.
He wrote: “Crazy AI Overview. 4 self-serving listicles are cited within the AIO but only one of brands that ranks themselves #1 is mentioned in the answer. ChatFin, Aleph and Pluvo all reinforcing their competitors’ positioning in AI tools.”
Here is the screenshot showing the AI Overview for the query “best ai fp&a software.”
Looking at the screenshot, the AI Overview cites sources like ChatFin, Aleph (getaleph.com), and Pluvo throughout its answer sources that appear to be self-published listicles ranking FP&A software. But instead of surfacing whichever brand each of those listicles ranks as #1, the AI Overview’s actual recommendations lean on a different mix of names Datarails, Planful, Pigment, Anaplan, Vena Solutions, Abacum, and Cube.
This points to an interesting dynamic in how AI Overviews pull from citation sources. A listicle written by a company to promote itself as the #1 pick can still get cited as a source, but the AI Overview isn’t necessarily repeating that company’s self-ranking it may be drawing broader conclusions from the page’s content while ignoring the self-serving positioning baked into it. In this case, ChatFin, Aleph, and Pluvo end up functioning more as data sources reinforcing competitor brands’ positioning, rather than boosting their own.
This is a useful reminder for brands relying on self-published “best of” content as an AI Overview citation strategy getting cited doesn’t guarantee the AI Overview will actually promote your own ranking.
The post AI Overview cites self-serving listicles, but skips the brand that ranks itself #1 appeared first on Search Engine Watch.
