As you can see, the multiples between the weighted median 100 Gbps and 400 Gbps prices are lowest on the highly competitive terrestrial routes in Europe, such as Frankfurt-London (2.6). They remain much higher on subsea routes like London-New York (3.8) and Los Angeles-Tokyo (3.9). Individual carrier price multiples for providers who offer both 100 Gbps and 400 Gbps service, ranged from 2.2 to 3.5 on terrestrial routes and from 3.0 to 3.7 subsea. So still a wide range in the market.
Looking solely at the price multiple doesn’t tell the whole story though. Larger savings on install and cross-connect charges as well as power consumption could be compelling factors for some high capacity buyers to shift towards 400 Gbps service. If history is any guide, multiples will continue to compress over time. Terrestrial networks will lead the way, followed by higher capacity subsea routes.
Forecasting 400G wavelength prices
High capacity customers continue to upgrade their networks and sales of 400 Gbps wavelengths continue to increase. With larger volumes, prices continue to fall. Between 2025 and 2032, 400 Gbps wavelengths across key global routes are forecasted to decrease an average of 16% compounded annually, a slightly higher pace than that of 100 Gbps. As 100 Gbps price erosion levels out and demand for 400 Gbps increases, price multiples between the two services will continue to compress.
Forecasted 400 Gbps Wavelength CAGR Price Decline
Â
For all but the very largest users of capacity, leasing wavelengths remains the status quo, as the economies of scale provided by spectrum or fiber pair ownership have remained out of reach. However, higher fiber count cables have the potential to change that by dramatically reducing the cost per bit and making fiber pair ownership far more affordable. Many customers are currently working through when it makes sense to purchase a fiber pair or spectrum instead of leasing wavelengths. But fiber pair pricing is very cable specific and not subject to the same pricing trends we discussed above, which is a big shift for the market.
Hyperscalers have also been increasing their direct ownership in new submarine cables for years. Historically, they have either partnered with service providers in a consortium for those investments or sold fiber pairs to providers, which injected fresh supply and competition into the wholesale market. There are concerns, though, about whether hyperscalers will continue to sell fiber on new systems and if they do, how many pairs per cable will be available. This could potentially limit supply and competition on some routes, curbing price reductions as well.
Despite this, the outlook for the wholesale market is not entirely doom and gloom. Customers are consuming more bandwidth than ever before, particularly with the increasing adoption of cloud services and emerging AI applications. Fulfilling the wholesale requirements for the long tail of capacity users that exists beyond hyperscalers will continue to be a challenging, but critical business going forward.
Get more intelligence like this
Our Transport Networks Research Service delivers data and analysis on long-haul networks and the undersea cable market, with forecasts of international bandwidth supply, demand, prices, and revenues. Learn more and get research samples delivered to your email.
Â



